GRE Reading Comprehension

Home > GMAT Test > GRE Reading Comprehension Questions

Next steps

Source: PP2

The most plausible justification for higher taxes on automobile fuel is that fuel consumption harms the environment and thus adds to the costs of the traffic congestion. But the fact that burning fuel creates these "negative externalities" does not imply that no tax on fuel could ever be too high. Economics is precise about the tax that should, in principle, be levied to deal with negative externalities: the tax on a liter of the fuel should be equal to the harm caused by using a liter of fuel. If the tax is more than that, its costs (including the inconvenience to those who would rather have used their cars) will exceed its benefits(including any reduction in congestion and pollution).

Question List: 1 2

In the contend in which it appears, " exceed " most nearly means

  • A outstrip
  • B magnify
  • C delimit
  • D offset
  • E supplant

Show Answer

Previous       Next